AZ Governor Jan Brewer Signs Bill to Allow Bible Classes in Public Schools

By Michael Gryboski via Christian Post

Governor while meeting with United States Pres...Arizona Governor Jan Brewer has signed into law a bill that allows the  establishing of elective classes that focus on the Bible and its influence on  western civilization.

Sponsored by State Representative Terri Proud, House Bill 2563 was passed by  a 21 to 9 vote in the state Senate last Thursday and signed by Brewer on  Tuesday.

According to HB 2563, “A school district or charter school may offer an  elective course pertaining to how the Bible has influenced western culture for  pupils in grades nine through twelve.”

“A teacher who instructs a course offered under this section in its  appropriate historical context and in good faith shall be immune from civil  liability and disciplinary action,” reads the bill.

The Bible class elective would teach students, among other things, “the  contents of the Old Testament and the New Testament,” “the history recorded by  the Old Testament and the New Testament,” and the “influence of the Old  Testament and the New Testament on laws, history, government, literature, art,  music, customs, morals, values and culture.”

HB 2563 was not without its critics, as church-state groups like Americans  United for the Separation of Church and State openly opposed the bill’s passage.  Joe Conn, spokesman for Americans United, told The Christian Post that he was  “disappointed” by the signing of the bill.

“This bill is not about improving academic achievement; it’s about  introducing religious indoctrination into the schools and currying favor with  conservative religious voters,” said Conn.

“I think most public schools will decide not to offer Bible courses. They are  already strapped for funds, so I doubt if they’ll want to use scarce resources  to intervene in such a controversial topic.”

While Conn believes that the “Bible obviously played an important role in  history,” he also felt that having a social studies class about it would be  difficult given the many Bible translations and interpretations.

“Many…denominations use different versions of the Bible and come to  dramatically different theological understandings about what it means,” said  Conn.

“It is very difficult for a public school to teach about the Bible without  wandering into constitutional and religious difficulties.”

Rep. Proud, the chief sponsor of the bill, told CP in an earlier interview  that she “worked with various attorneys and other individuals to ensure this  bill is constitutionally sound.”

“Many professors from various universities like Harvard, Yale etc. have  stated that biblical knowledge is a key factor to a successful education,” said  Proud.

“As the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly said: ‘[It] might well be said that  one’s education is not complete without a study of comparative religion, or the  history of religion and its relationship to the advancement of  civilization.’”

With the bill now officially a law, Arizona becomes the sixth state to allow  school districts to create elective classes studying the Bible. The other states  are Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, and South Carolina.

Read more at Christian Post.

Allen West: To Liberals, Safety Net Has Become a Hammock (And a Way of Life?)

By WILLIAM BERGSTROM via Politico

In a recent sit-down with The Atlas Society, Rep. Allen West warned that America could become “a socialist  egalitarian nanny state” and that liberals view the government’s safety net as a  hammock.

He also said the novel after which the D.C.-based  organization is named — Ayn Rand’s “Atlas Shrugged” — belongs behind just one  other book.

“I think that ‘Atlas Shrugged’ is the most  widely read book second only to the Bible, which is a good thing,” West said in an interview posted yesterday to The Atlas  Society’s website.

Asked if he’s ever criticized for his admiration of Ayn  Rand, West replied, “I get criticized for a lot of things, but that does not  bother me one bit because as they say in the military, you only take flack if  you are over the target.”

And the Florida  Republican’s target during this interview was, per usual, the opposing side.

“Conservatives believe that ever person who comes to  America or is born here, they have a ladder that they are given as their  birthright or becoming a citizen,” he said. “Sometimes you fall off of that  ladder, but we believe that there is a safety net that is there, and that safety  net is to catch you and get you to bounce back up and continue to climb on the  ladder. That’s what conservatives believe.

“But liberals tend to believe that the safety net is a  hammock, so you can stay there the rest of your life.”

Read more here.

Obama’s war on decency

By Robert Knight – The Washington Times

Official photographic portrait of US President...
Image via Wikipedia

Three incidents in recent days tell us all we need to know about the Obama administration’s “values.”

On Dec. 1, the story broke that Bethesda-based Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, where wounded veterans convalesce, apparently had banned visitors from bringing in Bibles or other religious items.

Walter Reed’s Chief of Staff C.W. Callahan issued a memo in September that said, “No religious items (i.e., Bibles, reading material, and/or artifacts) are allowed to be given away or used during a visit.”

Telling wounded soldiers and their families that their First Amendment freedoms have been suspended should be a firing offense.

Rep. Steve King, Iowa Republican, who serves on the House subcommittee on the Constitution, conveyed the gravity: “The idea that these soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines that have fought to defend our Constitution – and that includes our First Amendment rights to religious liberty – would be denied that religious liberty when they are lying in a hospital bed recovering from wounds incurred while defending that liberty is the most bitter and offensive type of an irony that I can think of.”

The policy was rescinded, but that it was imposed at all is a reminder of the culture President Obama has fostered in the armed forces and executive agencies, where extreme environmentalism, moral relativism and sexual immorality have replaced traditional American values. We shouldn’t really be surprised when a bureaucrat tries to bar Bibles in a U.S. military stateside hospital while other bureaucrats make sure terrorists in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, get copies of the Koran.

You almost have to feel sorry for poor Col. Callahan, who is part of the new metrosexual military, which values “diversity” more than combat readiness, so long as it doesn’t include Christianity.

Recall ArmyGen. George Casey’s comment after a Muslim extremist was charged in the slaughter of 13 people at Fort Hood, Texas, in November 2009: “Our diversity, not only in our Army, but in our country, is a strength. And as horrific as this tragedy was, if our diversity becomes a casualty, I think that’s worse.”

Announcing an end to the rule, Walter Reed public affairs officer Sandy Dean said a new policy “will be written to articulate our initial intention, which was to respect religious and cultural practices of our patients.” Say what?

Ms. Dean went on to insist that the policy was “in no way meant to prohibit family members from providing religious items to their loved ones at all.”

But that’s exactly what it said. Time for Groucho’s defense when caught in the act: “Are you going to believe me or your lying eyes?”

Here’s more from the hapless Ms. Dean: “We appreciate Congressman King bringing this to our attention. We don’t want our instructions to be ambiguous.”

Ambiguity is not the problem. It’s the Obama administration’s hostility to religion, except for Islam.

From the prevarications that helped sell Obamacare, to the lies surrounding Operation Fast and Furious, to the periodic emissions of horse pucky about Mr .Obama’s “evolving” view of marriage while he’s sabotaging the Defense of Marriage Act, it’s getting so bad that Obama administration spokesmen really should consider donning Groucho noses, glasses and mustaches. That would help disguise them, at least, and pave their way to enter the Witness Protection Program.

The second news item was Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s speech in Geneva on Tuesday, announcing that American taxpayers will be paying for homosexual activism around the world through a $3 million Global Equality Fund. That’s right. In a time when the United States is facing massive debt, plus a rising China and militant Islam, we’re going to use foreign aid money to promote “gay rights” to the world. Speaking to a crowd of diplomats, many of whom do not equate race or ethnicity with volitional sexual behavior that has moral implications, Mrs. Clinton urged everyone to come around to her point of view, saying, “I come here before you with respect, understanding and humility.” (Now do what I tell you.)

Once upon a time, foreign aid was allocated as an incentive for other nations to support the interests and security of the United States. Countries did not get the money if they worked with our enemies. But now, under left-wing Democrats, foreign aid is a tool to force a radical agenda on the rest of the world, regardless of America’s interests. I’m waiting for protest marches and cries of “cultural imperialism” from the Occupy This Squalid Dump crowd, but I think I might be waiting forever.

The third item is the Food and Drug Administration’s evil idea to allow the Plan B “morning-after pill” to be sold over the counter to anyone – regardless of age. After the story hit the fan, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius issued a directive on Wednesday to stop it. Plan B, which can act as an abortifacient, will continue to be sold over the counter without a prescription to anyone at least 17 years old. But 10-year-olds won’t be able to slip it onto the counter next to their gummy bears.

Is it really necessary to explain why children should not be allowed to buy a powerful drug? Should it be necessary to explain why wounded soldiers who risked their lives should be allowed to receive Bibles from their families, or why many Americans don’t want their country exporting the values of Sodom and Gomorrah instead of Valley Forge?

In Obama’s America, yes.

Robert Knight is senior fellow for the American Civil Rights Union and a columnist for the Washington Times.